1919 A4 Forums banner
1 - 6 of 6 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
929 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Any other Kali folks get a letter from the Kali DOJ announcing a proposed amendment to section 978.20 of Division 1, Title 11 of the California code of Regulations regarding the definitions of terms to identlfy assualt rifles? They plan to expand the definition of an "assault rifle" from 5 defined charachteristics to 6. The 6th would be: "capacity to accept a detachable magainze, as meaning: capable of accomodating a detachable magazine, but shall not be construed to include a firearm that has been permanently altered so that it cannot accomodate a detachable magazine."
...
On the surface it does not sound too horrible, but the term "capable of accomodating a detachable magazine..." has my antennae up -- it seems unnecessarily vague and make me think we're about to get screwed. Keep in mind the Kali DOJ definition of a magazine - "any ammunition feeding device."
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
636 Posts
When you get down to the nuts and bolts of that the DOJ says that belts and links are magazines.
 

·
PhD in Over-Engineering
Joined
·
12,242 Posts
Yeah, up to this point the 1919 was no more regulated than a bolt action. (Unless you put a flash hider on it.) This could change things, depending on how they decide to interpret the vageu language.

But then the feds don't even require a home build to have a serial number. This would end that practice in California.
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top