1919 A4 Forums banner

Gun owners do you need anymore proof?

1908 Views 15 Replies 9 Participants Last post by  Flash-hider
Hitlery is not stupid , Richardson has an A+ with the NRA and GOA.
Bill and Hill have been hanging around N.M. the last week.
This move will totally screw all contenders.
Write McCain ,Romney ,tell them you want Palin and you want her NOW.

Or just surrender.
1 - 3 of 16 Posts
Sorry Phal,, I was in my gunroom re-loading ammo,, Democrat or Republican,,, they're gonna do what they're gonna do,, the winner will have to take an oath the day he or she enters office,, something about supporting and defending the Constitution from all Enemies,, Foreign AND Domestic,, if they break the oath and try to do something REALLY STUPID,, they draw first blood,,, they break the Law,,, as I have said in the past,, "When a Government Breaks the Law,, there is no Law,, just a fight for Survival"

"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."

- Claire Wolfe

I'm gonna do some more re-loading now,,,
Also,, ask yourself,, When was the last time you went to bed worrying about your Religious Freedom? When was the last time your State, or any state passed a law that regulated a specific religion,, or banned it???

Answer is,,, they can't,,,,,

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

A state cannot make a law that takes away something that is Guaranteed by the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND!!!!!

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States

READ IT! What does it mean to you??? I don't give a Rats Ass what Hillary or Obama or McCain or Romney say,,,, if they do anything but SUPPORT AND DEFEND the Constitution,,, AS WRITTEN they are breaking the LAW!!

If you don't believe this,, then you have already lost your guns,,, If you are not ready to break ILLEGAL LAWS,,, then you have already given up your right to keep and bear arms,,, if your going to worry about losing a gun because a local ELECTED OFFICIAL says so,, and in doing so, breaks the OATH he or she took when entering Office,,, just save yourself a lot of grief,, a lot of sleep,, and a lot of time wasted whining on sites like this,,, and just turn em in,,, like a good little servant!
See less See more
I don't think it matters how pro gun the VP is. If the pres is anti we're in trouble. The lead candidates seem to be all pretty much anti.

Why would we be in trouble? They are the ones that will be trying to overthrow the Constitution,,, We are the ones in the Right,,, as long as we give them the right to take away our rights,, they will win.

As I recall,, King George was sort of Anti Colony,,,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--
See less See more
1 - 3 of 16 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.