Joined
·
6,504 Posts
I asked this question on another forum in response to something Kali said and am moving it over to here where it's more appropriate.
"Hey Kali, someone posted the other day that if you owned a high capacity magazine before the ban that you could still own and use it in Kali...is that correct? If it is and say you owned an MG42 drum or one of those IMA cans that attaches directly to the gun (just like a high cap mag), would that be legal to shoot a 250 round belt from??
Why would it make a legal difference whether it's a spring loaded plunger that pushes rounds from a magazine or a belt that pulls rounds from a magazine?
Does attaching an ammo can to a 1919 then make it a magazine?
Would the ammo can/magazine have to have been registered before the ban as a high capacity magazine?
"Hey Kali, someone posted the other day that if you owned a high capacity magazine before the ban that you could still own and use it in Kali...is that correct? If it is and say you owned an MG42 drum or one of those IMA cans that attaches directly to the gun (just like a high cap mag), would that be legal to shoot a 250 round belt from??
Why would it make a legal difference whether it's a spring loaded plunger that pushes rounds from a magazine or a belt that pulls rounds from a magazine?
Does attaching an ammo can to a 1919 then make it a magazine?
Would the ammo can/magazine have to have been registered before the ban as a high capacity magazine?