1919 A4 Forums banner

1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
LEGENDARY BULLY!
Joined
·
6,488 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
As Laura Ingrahm says,, "lets get to work".
Have youi guys heard about this "North American Unoin" stuff. G Gordon Liddy can be a goofy f*#k, but the stuff he has been talking about the last two days has been compelling radio.

http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=14965

North American Union to Replace USA?
by Jerome R. Corsi
Posted May 19, 2006

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.

The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:

The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments? physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.

Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.

Why doesn?t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?


I did a search and came up with this article,, there were a lot more.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
670 Posts
Seems odd for him to want to build a wall and use U.S. troops to guard our southern border, and require an American pass-port to re-enter the U.S. from Canada, and at the same time secretly create a "new country" that melds Canada & Mexico with us.

I think that the authors of this, and it's intended audience is found in the title, Unions. Union folks have been freaking out about NAFTA for years, they talk about new world orders, globalism, the U.N., and so on.

I think it is important to remember that we are a capitalism, or free market economy that MUST compete in the global arena. To compete, and competition is what our system is based on, with the likes of Asia and the EU (remember that some member states are poor as Mexico).

Competition is good, trims the worthless lard from our workforce. The American worker may have to start doing less for his/her own good, and more for the company, or U.S.A.

I was in a union when I worked at the airport, and I think that the crooked bastards that ran it did more harm to the company, and the workers than anything the managers could have.

Don't get me wrong, I favor isolationism, neutralist, and autocracy type "ideas", but the millionaire lawyers that own us do not.

I think that it's a complicated issue that has alot of mis-information caused by people who want to play on our emotions and fears to get what "THEY" want. However it plays out, I'm sure that the working man, blue collar, middle America types will feel the most of whatever pain it causes.
 

·
LEGENDARY BULLY!
Joined
·
6,488 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
EZFEED said:
Got my tinfoil hat strapped on tight for this one!:D
:D :D I Knew the T/F hats were gonna come up:D I listen to Liddy on Serius, and like I said, he comes off like he has a custom T/F hat,, but then I see the Big Rigs running the roads with the North American Continent outline with the three flags of Canada, USA and Mexico overprinted,,, kinda creepy.

Check this site out too,, http://spp.gov/
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
61 Posts
All I will say is this-Did anyone see the size of the stack of paperwork when they were pushing NAFTA?You cannot tell me those morons in Congress read EVERY word!:mad:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
487 Posts
trims the worthless lard from our workforce??? 2nd shooter, I don't know if you have noticed but that lard that is being trimmed is still being paid for by the blue collar smuck on the job. You also speak of capitalism with a glow in your eyes I don't agree with. Capitalism is all about making the most money. So the best way to do that is to get the cheapest labor seeing as all your suppliers have the same thing in mind and aren't going to let there capitalist dreams of owning more cars than they can possibly drive go for yours. Another result is a crappy product. I recomended to my boss making a 27 thousand dollar part out of stainless instead of aluminum so it would last longer, and he laughed at me saying he didn't want it to last, that is your capitalism. I honestly think that this country deserves with their present day morals , and the lack of the conservatives willingness to do anything , to go Spiralling into the drink. Next time your car breaks down because they used plastic manifolds or aluminum coated filament wire, call ford, or gm and thank them for saving a few pennies and being capitalist.
 

·
I wanna go shooting NOW!
Joined
·
3,251 Posts


Damn it where's my hat?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,503 Posts
I got MY tin-foil hat ready...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5 Posts
This is their true agenda if you ask me. All the indicators point to ulterior motives and the American Union fits the bill to a tee. Why the hell would our government want to build a highway from Mexico to Canada with no check points and total freedom of transpertation for Mexican truck drivers through the grand ol USofA? I promise you it wont be Americans using that road...though you will be taxed for its construction and upkeep. A wise man once said..."Just because I am paranoid, does not mean that they are not out to get me." A Faraday cage around the brain bucket may not be in fashion, but that does not mean it cannot be of use. :p

In short, be vigilent and vocal in the securing or your personal liberties...they are under attack.
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Top