Joined
·
136 Posts
That is most BS I have ever seen!!! A crock of ****!!! The olde commies made it big time on this one! Bastards!!!!
Before jumping to conclusions please note that Riverside County is a very gun friendly county.
"Mayman said he was comfortable dismissing two of the illegal-weapons possession counts because McKiernan appears to be a gun enthusiast whose collection had fallen out of compliance as state gun laws evolved."
ALSO
"He owned them prior to the law going into effect, and he didn't think they classified as assault weapons, so he didn't register them," Mayman said. "That's why we charged him with a misdemeanor, not a felony. This is not a guy who blatantly smuggled them into California knowing they were illegal."
If this was Los Angeles County, believe you me, he would be up on Assault Weapons charges as a felony and not a misdemeanor, see the District Attorney's statements above.
I personally don't think ANY gun law is constitutional, but this happening in California, and the guy getting all the gun charges dismissed or knocked down to a misdemeanor is a step forward.
I'm confused, if they are dropping the charges down to misdeameanors, then why would he be barred from weapons ownership?The fact is this gun owner will NOT be allowed to ever own a firearm again, because of bogus the gun laws!! If he is so much is found with a firearm, he will got to prison for 8-10 years. Yet, the MS-13 gang is wreaking havoc in LA and rest of CA., and with LIMITED resources, why don’t these bimbos go AFTER the REAL criminal!! It is TOO easy and poses no real danger to any one to go after law-abiding citizens, that’s why!! An easy hit, and another notch in the DA’s butt stock, so he can show he is “protecting” the public from “dangerous” criminals!! There is no jumping to conclusions here!!!
The fact is this gun owner will NOT be allowed to ever own a firearm again, because of bogus the gun laws!! If he is so much is found with a firearm, he will got to prison for 8-10 years. Yet, the MS-13 gang is wreaking havoc in LA and rest of CA., and with LIMITED resources, why don’t these bimbos go AFTER the REAL criminal!! It is TOO easy and poses no real danger to any one to go after law-abiding citizens, that’s why!! An easy hit, and another notch in the DA’s butt stock, so he can show he is “protecting” the public from “dangerous” criminals!! There is no jumping to conclusions here!!!
Sooo.......It's ok with you to hand a firearm to a confirmed psychopathI am not disagreeing with you. I personally do not believe in ANY gun law. Furthermore, I state openly that anyone who believes in even 1 gun law is a traitor to the cause and not worth calling himself a 2nd amendment believer.
Again, I do not believe in a single gun law, period.
I am not disagreeing with you. I personally do not believe in ANY gun law. Furthermore, I state openly that anyone who believes in even 1 gun law is a traitor to the cause and not worth calling himself a 2nd amendment believer.
What I am saying is, seeing that this is California, and what any other DA here could have charged him with, believe me that he is getting off easy. Do I condone the fact that he is facing charges? Not at all. Again, I do not believe in a single gun law, period.
I'm confused, if they are dropping the charges down to misdeameanors, then why would he be barred from weapons ownership?
Forget that I said that, just saw they charged him with a felony on the explosives....assholes...
What a stupid reasoning. Unless I am talking to a retard or a 5 year old.Sooo.......It's ok with you to hand a firearm to a confirmed psychopath, schitzo
, confirmed mass murderer
or child, perhaps like a 5 or 6 year old?
![]()
There was absolutely no reasoning in my question. It's based entirely off of your statement, which has no reasoning in that you state NO gun law is appropriate and that anyone that believes in any gun law is a traitor. You were pretty clear cut, no gray areas.What a stupid reasoning. Unless I am talking to a retard or a 5 year old.
I just noticed your sig line that you are an FFL. Of course you would enthusiastically support gun laws, otherwise, you would be out of business.There was absolutely no reasoning in my question. It's based entirely off of your statement, which has no reasoning in that you state NO gun law is appropriate and that anyone that believes in any gun law is a traitor. You were pretty clear cut, no gray areas.
Clearly, some kind of gun law MUST be in place, otherwise, retards, schitzos, murderers and children would be able to be in possesion. If theres no gun law placing an age restriction on firearms possession, then a child can have a stick of juicy fruit just like he can then have a cute little .25 in his pocket. There's nothing retarded here, it's just that your statement was a bit extreme in denouncing any type of regulation.
Now that you agree that my sarcastic statement for you allowing a retard, schitzo, psychopath or child to have a gun would be CRAZY and innapropriate, how do you propose to prohibit those people from possesing a firearm unless you create a gun law outlining those limitations?
And then, if you support legislating to prevent the above mentioned classes of people from having guns, aren't you already supporting some type of gun law?